Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp9644728rwd; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:57:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4IQb1Vyxt+BDVBnqmx3bKXjyi4H3RHqzDGyRD5w/8pBKzkEj2z0ILuQhcIaAZRLebKSgyB X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:3a99:b0:6b1:6f73:92eb with SMTP id dj25-20020a0568303a9900b006b16f7392ebmr15284506otb.37.1687366626864; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:57:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1687366626; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UWYVEKlkxsCo5Y4lKjTAQZSRycTpUWmF2zmJseT+/SqOYvxMozhIFkByWTJdUAd8O4 yECAhDSzB+pFC/TMEEsuvEAQFJQnP5cjyrIS7/4D3zLu5gVFZCQTEMIFe/WEVI+IjWcM 8tt+5lsdiU/j7G8MeZT1t/0BTHLC+iAhxBCYflSmF1FJD0MJemNcurEgw4Pz+ak5MiGC 0dwcuYqHjeFsSLtPBv3QWMgNIH/ZBdpNKLJJAsI3FCcBzzKipHGnYX+55CcQ0y7qFFb9 gSlTAX8dn0KnK3zK7obaD3MUN8qkO/w/FKPcaWuoJW6E6AMenrVeQL1RhfFwcVCIttYA tHpQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=/u3R6ommui0jzmNm5KqQbCKjAYY2UMYMLfe/n8/4JuI=; b=tkAy08ds7JVVaLvVzqiUiWvyA0U+4fZ66+SqfPxj5dn95Yk1x4wy9hAOes3YTJtiEv bOU7/ArB5PQSoc4huFcGQt6LZQrkEVIE6btsDBunM6oosZwWbTPKh4wEkuAqXFbb7h5v Z7WRTZoLCKzDQzTpVdZPhk/G+vnPq5G5K9fm4Ut2YRrjgeibiCanw+H2c1MJV7jkSTDC cuqbCdmrhn0S0zopiRUvwxkgf4zm0vEvkU/y+QFiLDR5eY8D795S6RFycP3RDFiKnoW2 o0WYFhaAHMoxeA5gObOD1g2iB4HfzZLSDZy0gKhJidcKLlpxGbizhPuv9I/6k5yCldFi JLmw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=SA7wCjqc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i189-20020a6387c6000000b005533bc87744si4403207pge.816.2023.06.21.09.56.53; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=SA7wCjqc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229682AbjFUQqe (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:46:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39208 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229776AbjFUQqX (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:46:23 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F8FF1BD4; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:46:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=/u3R6ommui0jzmNm5KqQbCKjAYY2UMYMLfe/n8/4JuI=; b=SA7wCjqcWMwZI6QRZjnXU4BdsS H2NVvLwwEgWYTdDfqbIir6UM//Pdysn6BSpEU5tQrwXLiUi9lYRn6b1kZ9qx1fAUBvXd7kLDwwkhY 5AAQLBbNy1luSMqNDTeWh+iK0WGYWrfqKDGYqZciSOpheoDHNVBuHpWm43NXX9E4ZJXfruCyIH/UW HB+wG8b8HwLzzjf53mwVPcA53m7cznZE0yRcrwmRkU0fOjoCKs9ya07eXP9QmjjMztGSPQSsClls5 jOcuaSGUbCg3/YuJMblU2LvWjfE9SoN7h5k2L6Zq6mpZcMsd5xCOJiy9+fCqNLsH/jrQq/u4kXAFF K/koQlnw==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qC0y2-00EjEX-9H; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 16:46:02 +0000 From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" To: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 10/13] mm: Remove struct pagevec Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 17:45:54 +0100 Message-Id: <20230621164557.3510324-11-willy@infradead.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.1 In-Reply-To: <20230621164557.3510324-1-willy@infradead.org> References: <20230621164557.3510324-1-willy@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org All users are now converted to use the folio_batch so we can get rid of this data structure. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) --- include/linux/pagevec.h | 63 +++-------------------------------------- mm/swap.c | 18 ++++++------ 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/pagevec.h b/include/linux/pagevec.h index 3a9d29dd28a3..87cc678adc85 100644 --- a/include/linux/pagevec.h +++ b/include/linux/pagevec.h @@ -3,65 +3,18 @@ * include/linux/pagevec.h * * In many places it is efficient to batch an operation up against multiple - * pages. A pagevec is a multipage container which is used for that. + * folios. A folio_batch is a container which is used for that. */ #ifndef _LINUX_PAGEVEC_H #define _LINUX_PAGEVEC_H -#include +#include -/* 15 pointers + header align the pagevec structure to a power of two */ +/* 15 pointers + header align the folio_batch structure to a power of two */ #define PAGEVEC_SIZE 15 -struct page; struct folio; -struct address_space; - -/* Layout must match folio_batch */ -struct pagevec { - unsigned char nr; - bool percpu_pvec_drained; - struct page *pages[PAGEVEC_SIZE]; -}; - -void __pagevec_release(struct pagevec *pvec); - -static inline void pagevec_init(struct pagevec *pvec) -{ - pvec->nr = 0; - pvec->percpu_pvec_drained = false; -} - -static inline void pagevec_reinit(struct pagevec *pvec) -{ - pvec->nr = 0; -} - -static inline unsigned pagevec_count(struct pagevec *pvec) -{ - return pvec->nr; -} - -static inline unsigned pagevec_space(struct pagevec *pvec) -{ - return PAGEVEC_SIZE - pvec->nr; -} - -/* - * Add a page to a pagevec. Returns the number of slots still available. - */ -static inline unsigned pagevec_add(struct pagevec *pvec, struct page *page) -{ - pvec->pages[pvec->nr++] = page; - return pagevec_space(pvec); -} - -static inline void pagevec_release(struct pagevec *pvec) -{ - if (pagevec_count(pvec)) - __pagevec_release(pvec); -} /** * struct folio_batch - A collection of folios. @@ -78,11 +31,6 @@ struct folio_batch { struct folio *folios[PAGEVEC_SIZE]; }; -/* Layout must match pagevec */ -static_assert(sizeof(struct pagevec) == sizeof(struct folio_batch)); -static_assert(offsetof(struct pagevec, pages) == - offsetof(struct folio_batch, folios)); - /** * folio_batch_init() - Initialise a batch of folios * @fbatch: The folio batch. @@ -127,10 +75,7 @@ static inline unsigned folio_batch_add(struct folio_batch *fbatch, return folio_batch_space(fbatch); } -static inline void __folio_batch_release(struct folio_batch *fbatch) -{ - __pagevec_release((struct pagevec *)fbatch); -} +void __folio_batch_release(struct folio_batch *pvec); static inline void folio_batch_release(struct folio_batch *fbatch) { diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c index 423199ee8478..10348c1cf9c5 100644 --- a/mm/swap.c +++ b/mm/swap.c @@ -1044,25 +1044,25 @@ void release_pages(release_pages_arg arg, int nr) EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_pages); /* - * The pages which we're about to release may be in the deferred lru-addition + * The folios which we're about to release may be in the deferred lru-addition * queues. That would prevent them from really being freed right now. That's - * OK from a correctness point of view but is inefficient - those pages may be + * OK from a correctness point of view but is inefficient - those folios may be * cache-warm and we want to give them back to the page allocator ASAP. * - * So __pagevec_release() will drain those queues here. + * So __folio_batch_release() will drain those queues here. * folio_batch_move_lru() calls folios_put() directly to avoid * mutual recursion. */ -void __pagevec_release(struct pagevec *pvec) +void __folio_batch_release(struct folio_batch *fbatch) { - if (!pvec->percpu_pvec_drained) { + if (!fbatch->percpu_pvec_drained) { lru_add_drain(); - pvec->percpu_pvec_drained = true; + fbatch->percpu_pvec_drained = true; } - release_pages(pvec->pages, pagevec_count(pvec)); - pagevec_reinit(pvec); + release_pages(fbatch->folios, folio_batch_count(fbatch)); + folio_batch_reinit(fbatch); } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(__pagevec_release); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__folio_batch_release); /** * folio_batch_remove_exceptionals() - Prune non-folios from a batch. -- 2.39.2