Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp35760256rwd; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 12:09:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlFsMrJ291Mqfw7oaWXhkhmR92sHxWeirK02QAYhYYjjf1eTO/y/jkj70g5j9L8XwpOU38/S X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:3920:b0:668:69fa:f791 with SMTP id fh32-20020a056a00392000b0066869faf791mr11406616pfb.3.1689016168105; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 12:09:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1689016168; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=AzlJFALrQsDIyJZ8rG7yr7dq5pMt+WGfMQUVYJopXjEfLbG42EGQ9KJFwAzllNWZkD N0G5yqZt7vJ7fDwUbToeZuW7JHvcbjMhbXkOeGfeCz2ewzxRUqJ49FKbxdxq4KsPbTj/ CoOLRGQZaHgjzTawgEyDKpsiHycI0wAj5gx1VKQEA8//0uHX2d5n0PGkltJ+YxGcQ9ke PJlWXoOGbp//8Ykcy15BKqH0DhOUkrI1yMgmoIGzhsO8GrhO7oNKqo+ezb5RhaaZEUum o/lo9ikJ2xZ946eRPxaU6/oWTS3Fqz2GUyG7J+oEjQqMJRA0NddT+1c1e2+timZnxCwP uOlA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=fFEQSXE0AG6gSCZClYRJT9tmLAmaIP7FJtGdIAufoe8=; fh=payWQfxJVtxyXKUmRdA28rZc2WEK3z842fL/mGLIh9A=; b=UkmeD+W5opWPoYmIAqi6vQjN2MLyYNwA76lgRe/KxLCDU+xhQRRniGAk5wBsOv7TYq IX4Z5FRxvJF0HMCoNbWfPqwgocwOMyi/EGIV495iY8ndZNjbLsEmirDWs2d2nMqHgkTo vAEeg2PCvnGr3pmeMbC8jgBaIpBqrgSAmHBFnuRbUlDw7TYm4FudfG0cMzYAJXhTlz5y akKC1I4TYVTklnce8dZQiNfJdqNcpsAIQnGcY6B5el+GzqYDCe3WMLbxMICM5vAe5fwo heK7J515YoLxKAbw0FF3u67vC0LqCXmln8rPU3S5GvF3DhWWO9iBIT9y7D6uWp6MPKaU 9rDw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=YZzHnnI6; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i8-20020a63e908000000b005579f529f71si67535pgh.793.2023.07.10.12.08.57; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 12:09:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=YZzHnnI6; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233024AbjGJS54 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 10 Jul 2023 14:57:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57244 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233059AbjGJS5y (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2023 14:57:54 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B89CC106 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 11:57:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B19B611AC for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 18:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D3AFC433C8; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 18:57:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1689015471; bh=L7WBhDsB2KWk2c5QRTze86AiIO7Voa0i0pglOp64msE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YZzHnnI624hXU3hdgTE+cRXKvdXCK0rSL0HMODxqkUlQSZFNgZ8zF4Wi79CotXggJ HcVC08RzZDRT6lawlCe51AXF6XgDGRpjgzUpAw7quO+28dkzBBU3Rp4yHVclYiN+PN Qg2xHfCuTZGaNP+VviV6cHifH5f4595FBn4ssuVAvAGoGfL0f0UtUk2EPtqKCYkxhN 4xwnPy0fM2uCK5bLgYGj/CNW/O8wS3BMNagNQYgsna9RAiGw1fgsuskeoKlTldUnEB Kgk59jxoDbojHVDgwUgpniGxXE/XR3yljr7kgq+PBJOCIDLA/G+ZHEGS+yK8lRyBVv rukHPIQZDZHcg== Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 14:57:48 -0400 From: Chuck Lever To: Jeff Layton Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Chuck Lever , lorenzo@kernel.org, neilb@suse.de, david@fromorbit.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] SUNRPC: Convert RQ_BUSY into a per-pool bitmap Message-ID: References: <168900729243.7514.15141312295052254929.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> <168900737297.7514.333293207540036098.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 02:28:56PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Mon, 2023-07-10 at 12:42 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > > From: Chuck Lever > > > > I've noticed that client-observed server request latency goes up > > simply when the nfsd thread count is increased. > > > > Walking the whole set of pool threads is memory-inefficient. On a > > busy server with many threads, enqueuing a transport will visit all > > the threads in the pool quite frequently. This also pulls in the > > cache lines for some hot fields in each svc_rqst (namely, rq_flags). > > > > The svc_xprt_enqueue() call that concerns me most is the one in > > svc_rdma_wc_receive(), which is single-threaded per CQ. Slowing > > down completion handling limits the total throughput per RDMA > > connection. > > > > Instead, set up a busy bitmap and use find_next_clear_bit, which > > should work the same way as RQ_BUSY but will touch only the cache > > lines that the bitmap is in. Stick with atomic bit operations to > > avoid taking a spinlock during the search. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever > > --- > > include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h | 6 ++++-- > > include/trace/events/sunrpc.h | 1 - > > net/sunrpc/svc.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++----- > > net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------ > > 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h > > index 86377506a514..6669f3eb9ed4 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h > > +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h > > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct svc_pool { > > spinlock_t sp_lock; /* protects sp_sockets */ > > struct list_head sp_sockets; /* pending sockets */ > > unsigned int sp_nrthreads; /* # of threads in pool */ > > + unsigned long *sp_busy_map; /* running threads */ > > struct xarray sp_thread_xa; > > > > /* statistics on pool operation */ > > @@ -191,6 +192,8 @@ extern u32 svc_max_payload(const struct svc_rqst *rqstp); > > #define RPCSVC_MAXPAGES ((RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD+PAGE_SIZE-1)/PAGE_SIZE \ > > + 2 + 1) > > > > +#define RPCSVC_MAXPOOLTHREADS (4096) > > + > > /* > > * The context of a single thread, including the request currently being > > * processed. > > @@ -240,8 +243,7 @@ struct svc_rqst { > > #define RQ_SPLICE_OK (4) /* turned off in gss privacy > > * to prevent encrypting page > > * cache pages */ > > -#define RQ_BUSY (5) /* request is busy */ > > -#define RQ_DATA (6) /* request has data */ > > +#define RQ_DATA (5) /* request has data */ > > unsigned long rq_flags; /* flags field */ > > u32 rq_thread_id; /* xarray index */ > > ktime_t rq_qtime; /* enqueue time */ > > diff --git a/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h b/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h > > index ea43c6059bdb..c07824a254bf 100644 > > --- a/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h > > +++ b/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h > > @@ -1676,7 +1676,6 @@ DEFINE_SVCXDRBUF_EVENT(sendto); > > svc_rqst_flag(USEDEFERRAL) \ > > svc_rqst_flag(DROPME) \ > > svc_rqst_flag(SPLICE_OK) \ > > - svc_rqst_flag(BUSY) \ > > svc_rqst_flag_end(DATA) > > > > #undef svc_rqst_flag > > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc.c b/net/sunrpc/svc.c > > index 109d7f047385..f6305b66fd28 100644 > > --- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c > > +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c > > @@ -509,6 +509,12 @@ __svc_create(struct svc_program *prog, unsigned int bufsize, int npools, > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->sp_sockets); > > spin_lock_init(&pool->sp_lock); > > xa_init_flags(&pool->sp_thread_xa, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC); > > + pool->sp_busy_map = > > + bitmap_alloc_node(RPCSVC_MAXPOOLTHREADS, GFP_KERNEL, > > + svc_pool_map_get_node(i)); > > + if (!pool->sp_busy_map) > > + return NULL; > > + bitmap_fill(pool->sp_busy_map, RPCSVC_MAXPOOLTHREADS); > > > > percpu_counter_init(&pool->sp_messages_arrived, 0, GFP_KERNEL); > > percpu_counter_init(&pool->sp_sockets_queued, 0, GFP_KERNEL); > > @@ -598,6 +604,8 @@ svc_destroy(struct kref *ref) > > percpu_counter_destroy(&pool->sp_threads_no_work); > > > > xa_destroy(&pool->sp_thread_xa); > > + bitmap_free(pool->sp_busy_map); > > + pool->sp_busy_map = NULL; > > } > > kfree(serv->sv_pools); > > kfree(serv); > > @@ -649,7 +657,6 @@ svc_rqst_alloc(struct svc_serv *serv, struct svc_pool *pool, int node) > > > > folio_batch_init(&rqstp->rq_fbatch); > > > > - __set_bit(RQ_BUSY, &rqstp->rq_flags); > > rqstp->rq_server = serv; > > rqstp->rq_pool = pool; > > > > @@ -679,7 +686,7 @@ static struct svc_rqst * > > svc_prepare_thread(struct svc_serv *serv, struct svc_pool *pool, int node) > > { > > struct xa_limit limit = { > > - .max = U32_MAX, > > + .max = RPCSVC_MAXPOOLTHREADS, > > }; > > struct svc_rqst *rqstp; > > int ret; > > @@ -724,12 +731,19 @@ struct svc_rqst *svc_pool_wake_idle_thread(struct svc_serv *serv, > > struct svc_pool *pool) > > { > > struct svc_rqst *rqstp; > > - unsigned long index; > > + unsigned long bit; > > > > - xa_for_each(&pool->sp_thread_xa, index, rqstp) { > > - if (test_and_set_bit(RQ_BUSY, &rqstp->rq_flags)) > > + /* Check the pool's idle bitmap locklessly so that multiple > > + * idle searches can proceed concurrently. > > + */ > > + for_each_clear_bit(bit, pool->sp_busy_map, pool->sp_nrthreads) { > > + if (test_and_set_bit(bit, pool->sp_busy_map)) > > continue; > > > > > > I wonder if we also need to set the sp_busy_map bit when we're trying to > shrink the threadpool? It seems like the code above that is trying to > find a thread to do work could race with the task being killed, such > that we try to take up a task that is no longer functional. What I /think/ will happen is that while svc_pool_victim() is holding the xa_lock, it will remove the rqst from the xarray. Then when svc_pool_wake_idle_thread() calls xa_load(), it should get a NULL, and treat that like a pool that doesn't have an available thread to wake. > > + rqstp = xa_load(&pool->sp_thread_xa, bit); > > + if (!rqstp) > > + break; > > + > > WRITE_ONCE(rqstp->rq_qtime, ktime_get()); > > wake_up_process(rqstp->rq_task); > > percpu_counter_inc(&pool->sp_threads_woken); > > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c > > index db40f771b60a..f9c9babe0cba 100644 > > --- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c > > +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c > > @@ -735,6 +735,21 @@ rqst_should_sleep(struct svc_rqst *rqstp) > > return true; > > } > > > > +static void svc_pool_thread_mark_idle(struct svc_pool *pool, > > + struct svc_rqst *rqstp) > > +{ > > + clear_bit_unlock(rqstp->rq_thread_id, pool->sp_busy_map); > > +} > > + > > +/* > > + * Note: If we were awoken, then this rqstp has already been marked busy. > > + */ > > +static void svc_pool_thread_mark_busy(struct svc_pool *pool, > > + struct svc_rqst *rqstp) > > +{ > > + test_and_set_bit_lock(rqstp->rq_thread_id, pool->sp_busy_map); > > +} > > + > > static struct svc_xprt *svc_get_next_xprt(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, long timeout) > > { > > struct svc_pool *pool = rqstp->rq_pool; > > @@ -756,18 +771,17 @@ static struct svc_xprt *svc_get_next_xprt(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, long timeout) > > set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); > > smp_mb__before_atomic(); > > clear_bit(SP_CONGESTED, &pool->sp_flags); > > - clear_bit(RQ_BUSY, &rqstp->rq_flags); > > - smp_mb__after_atomic(); > > > > - if (likely(rqst_should_sleep(rqstp))) > > + if (likely(rqst_should_sleep(rqstp))) { > > + svc_pool_thread_mark_idle(pool, rqstp); > > time_left = schedule_timeout(timeout); > > - else > > + } else > > __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); > > > > try_to_freeze(); > > > > - set_bit(RQ_BUSY, &rqstp->rq_flags); > > - smp_mb__after_atomic(); > > + svc_pool_thread_mark_busy(pool, rqstp); > > + > > rqstp->rq_xprt = svc_xprt_dequeue(pool); > > if (rqstp->rq_xprt) { > > trace_svc_pool_awoken(rqstp); > > > > > > -- > Jeff Layton