Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:5;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2e840ad028869edeb4238869eca81593820688b1.camel@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <2e840ad028869edeb4238869eca81593820688b1.camel@kernel.org>
From:   Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2023 09:55:30 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFX2Jfmrh1YVtf_G1pSsORnF5qVMBjrgMBsS4BWTmx+vLdoAZw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: missing patches for v6.6-rc
To:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>,
        Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Hi Jeff,

On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 8:49=E2=80=AFAM Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wr=
ote:
>
> Hi Anna,
>
> There are a couple of client side patches that I think we want in v6.6,
> but that haven't shown up in linux-next yet. Do you still plan to take
> these from Dai and Scott?

I've pushed out Dai's patch to my linux-next branch, and I can do
another pull request before the end of the 6.6 cycle. Is Scott's patch
still needed after your patch "nfs: decrement nrequests counter before
releasing the req" which went into 6.6-rc5? If so, it doesn't apply
cleanly on top of the current code so I'll need to fix it up.

Anna

>
>     [PATCH 1/1] NFS: Fix potential oops in nfs_inode_remove_request()
>     [PATCH v3 1/1] nfs42: client needs to strip file mode's suid/sgid bit=
 after ALLOCATE op
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>