Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:3;
From:   Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
To:     Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
Cc:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
        Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>,
        Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Subject: Re: missing patches for v6.6-rc
Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2023 10:01:21 -0400
Message-ID: <09B062C8-6D70-4BAF-88C0-07A3BA3A36EC@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFX2Jfmrh1YVtf_G1pSsORnF5qVMBjrgMBsS4BWTmx+vLdoAZw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2e840ad028869edeb4238869eca81593820688b1.camel@kernel.org>
 <CAFX2Jfmrh1YVtf_G1pSsORnF5qVMBjrgMBsS4BWTmx+vLdoAZw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 11 Oct 2023, at 9:55, Anna Schumaker wrote:

> Hi Jeff,
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 8:49 AM Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Anna,
>>
>> There are a couple of client side patches that I think we want in v6.6,
>> but that haven't shown up in linux-next yet. Do you still plan to take
>> these from Dai and Scott?
>
> I've pushed out Dai's patch to my linux-next branch, and I can do
> another pull request before the end of the 6.6 cycle. Is Scott's patch
> still needed after your patch "nfs: decrement nrequests counter before
> releasing the req" which went into 6.6-rc5? If so, it doesn't apply
> cleanly on top of the current code so I'll need to fix it up.

Yes, that patch is definitely needed.

Want me to send a current version?

Ben