Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:8 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:8;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALXu0Ufzu8FMdH=-_35tHNqu3c6ewf4d6a379=fUMwNvGq_rgQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALXu0Ufzu8FMdH=-_35tHNqu3c6ewf4d6a379=fUMwNvGq_rgQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Anna Schumaker <schumaker.anna@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Oct 2023 15:32:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFX2JfkRpfRe6-T3MELWsAX_V5xyZoiv0Prq_1qq4-5Pi4PCag@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NFSv4.2: READ_PLUS - when safe to use?
To:     Cedric Blancher <cedric.blancher@gmail.com>
Cc:     Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Hi Ced,

On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 9:08=E2=80=AFAM Cedric Blancher
<cedric.blancher@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Good afternoon!
>
> Since which kernel versions (NFS server, NFS client) is NFSv4.2
> READ_PLUS safely usable?

Linux 6.2 for the server side and 6.6 for the client.

>
> Also, could you make this a mount option, so people can turn this
> on/off per mount, instead of using a kernel build option for this?

The eventual plan is to remove the kernel build option entirely. We
probably won't do a mount option, and just have it enabled by default
when using NFS v4.2.

I hope this helps,
Anna

>
> Ced
> --
> Cedric Blancher <cedric.blancher@gmail.com>
> [https://plus.google.com/u/0/+CedricBlancher/]
> Institute Pasteur