Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:3;
Message-ID: <98066647-bcc8-4231-b6d8-2eff4a1d48fe@benettiengineering.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2023 23:18:00 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [nfs-utils 1/2] Fix build failure due to glibc <= 2.24 and check
 for Linux 3.17+
To:     Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc:     linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
References: <20231026114522.567140-1-giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
 <20231026194712.615384-1-pvorel@suse.cz>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
In-Reply-To: <20231026194712.615384-1-pvorel@suse.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Petr,

On 26/10/23 21:47, Petr Vorel wrote:
> interesting, I yesterday sent patch [1] solving the same problem (although it
> might not be that obvious from the patchset name). Let's see which one will be
> taken.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Petr
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20231025205720.GB460410@pevik/T/#m4c02286afae09318f6b95ff837750708d5065cd5

I totally forgotten to check Patchwork before working on it. Your patch
looks good, better than mine. Maybe you can improve the part of the
syscall because it's not always available. You can then send a patch for
Buildroot too with the patch you've pointed since there you're
nfs-utils package Maintainer too.

-- 
Giulio Benetti
CEO&CTO@Benetti Engineering sas