Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs+bounces-201-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:25:25 +0000
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>, linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] nfsd fixes for 6.5.y
Message-ID: <2023113013-fanning-esophagus-787f@gregkh>
References: <170120874713.1515.13712791731008720729.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net>
 <3C2A1F40-C0F3-412E-87ED-66AC1A2CA0F4@oracle.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <3C2A1F40-C0F3-412E-87ED-66AC1A2CA0F4@oracle.com>

On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:07:11PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Nov 28, 2023, at 4:59 PM, Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Backport of upstream fixes to NFSD's duplicate reply cache. These 
> > have been hand-applied and tested with the same reproducer as was 
> > used to create the upstream fixes.
> 
> After applying patches 1 through 6 cleanly, these applied with fuzz
> and offset but no rejection -- the same as the 6.6.y patch set.
> The context changes were due to Lorenzo's new nfsd netlink protocol.

6.5.y is now end-of-life, sorry.

greg k-h