Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs+bounces-1118-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240115063605.2064-1-chenhx.fnst@fujitsu.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240115063605.2064-1-chenhx.fnst@fujitsu.com>
From: Dan Shelton <dan.f.shelton@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 02:02:00 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAvCNcDxZF-ftqb1dRnjUW-q-1m2kyqN-MAGNXUd+i1r_b_vSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsv4: Add support for the birth time attribute
To: Chen Hanxiao <chenhx.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>, Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>, 
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 07:37, Chen Hanxiao <chenhx.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> This patch enable nfs to report btime in nfs_getattr.
> If underlying filesystem supports "btime" timestamp,
> statx will report btime for STATX_BTIME.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhx.fnst@fujitsu.com>
> ---
> v1:
>     Don't revalidate btime attribute
>
> RFC v2:
>     properly set cache validity
>
>  fs/nfs/inode.c          | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
>  fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c       |  3 +++
>  fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c        | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/nfs_fs.h  |  2 ++
>  include/linux/nfs_xdr.h |  5 ++++-
>  5 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)#

Hello

Where is the patch which adds support for btime to nfsd?

Dan
-- 
Dan Shelton - Cluster Specialist Win/Lin/Bsd