Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs+bounces-2089-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
From: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
Subject: [PATCH v2] nfs: keep server info for remounts
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 20:29:08 +0100
Message-Id: <20240226192908.48789-1-martin@kaiser.cx>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

With newer kernels that use fs_context for nfs mounts, remounts fail with
-EINVAL.

$ mount -t nfs -o nolock 10.0.0.1:/tmp/test /mnt/test/
$ mount -t nfs -o remount /mnt/test/
mount: mounting 10.0.0.1:/tmp/test on /mnt/test failed: Invalid argument

For remounts, the nfs server address and port are populated by
nfs_init_fs_context and later overwritten with 0x00 bytes by
nfs23_parse_monolithic. The remount then fails as the server address is
invalid.

Fix this by not overwriting nfs server info in nfs23_parse_monolithic if
we're doing a remount.

Fixes: f2aedb713c28 ("NFS: Add fs_context support.")
Signed-off-by: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
---
v2:
 - rebased against today's linux-next

Dear all,
I'm resending this patch, it might have slipped through the cracks. The
problem that I'm trying to fix is still present in linux-next. Thanks in
advance for any reviews and comments.


I guess that we're taking this path for remounts

do_remount
    fs_context_for_reconfigure
        alloc_fs_context
            init_fs_context == nfs_init_fs_context
               fc->root is set for remounts
               ctx->nfs_server is populated
    parse_monolithic_mount_data
        nfs_fs_context_parse_monolithic
            nfs23_parse_monolithic
               ctx->nfs_server is overwritten with data from mount request

An alternative to checking for !is_remount_fc(fc) would be to check
if (ctx->nfs_server.addrlen == 0)

 fs/nfs/fs_context.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/fs_context.c b/fs/nfs/fs_context.c
index 853e8d609bb3..41126d6dcd76 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/fs_context.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/fs_context.c
@@ -1111,9 +1111,12 @@ static int nfs23_parse_monolithic(struct fs_context *fc,
 		ctx->acdirmax	= data->acdirmax;
 		ctx->need_mount	= false;
 
-		memcpy(sap, &data->addr, sizeof(data->addr));
-		ctx->nfs_server.addrlen = sizeof(data->addr);
-		ctx->nfs_server.port = ntohs(data->addr.sin_port);
+		if (!is_remount_fc(fc)) {
+			memcpy(sap, &data->addr, sizeof(data->addr));
+			ctx->nfs_server.addrlen = sizeof(data->addr);
+			ctx->nfs_server.port = ntohs(data->addr.sin_port);
+		}
+
 		if (sap->ss_family != AF_INET ||
 		    !nfs_verify_server_address(sap))
 			goto out_no_address;
-- 
2.39.2