Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs+bounces-2352-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAvCNcDtTNDRvUVjUy4BE7eBCgmkb6hfkq3P0jaGDC=OXg0=6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKAoaQmmEv+HRjmBMrSMGZn9RQr8C=2W4yeX4vNnohXFJPCV5A@mail.gmail.com>
 <65a29ca8.6b0a0220.ad415.d6d8.GMR@mx.google.com> <CAKAoaQkZ+b7NfrVi=gu1vCJBvv10=k85bG_kZV9G3jE45OOquw@mail.gmail.com>
 <0cd8fbfc707f86784dc7d88653b05cd355f89aad.camel@kernel.org>
 <24ACA376-5239-4941-BE53-70BF5E5E4683@oracle.com> <CAKAoaQny6G=JcKpJTYeLmNBEMgNkkc--T0Uvs1YbEX+JUD-PoA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANH4o6NcMbcNKxARcqhthXWkKk6_r31iKGjnS-RhFBB_AJFaJg@mail.gmail.com>
 <470318C6-3252-445F-94F3-DDB7727F84C7@oracle.com> <CAKAoaQ=6nGHD0uA+9EaQQPWBk8dvq0XVUPPgPAhbh=XPk+ecSg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKAoaQ=6nGHD0uA+9EaQQPWBk8dvq0XVUPPgPAhbh=XPk+ecSg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roland Mainz <roland.mainz@nrubsig.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 14:16:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKAoaQ=K7wQoZD7LAsYm2OCB-AU-0yyhJcch8voLr5_LC721CA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: |ca_maxoperations| - tuneable ? / was: Re: RFE: Linux nfsd's
 |ca_maxoperations| should be at *least* |64| ... / was: Re: kernel.org list
 issues... / was: Fwd: Turn NFSD_MAX_* into tuneables ? / was: Re: Increasing
 NFSD_MAX_OPS_PER_COMPOUND to 96
To: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 12:55=E2=80=AFPM Roland Mainz <roland.mainz@nrubsig=
.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 3:52=E2=80=AFPM Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@orac=
le.com> wrote:
> > > On Jan 18, 2024, at 4:44=E2=80=AFAM, Martin Wege <martin.l.wege@gmail=
.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 2:57=E2=80=AFAM Roland Mainz <roland.mainz@nr=
ubsig.org> wrote:
> > >> On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 5:10=E2=80=AFPM Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever=
@oracle.com> wrote:
> > >>>> On Jan 13, 2024, at 10:09=E2=80=AFAM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.=
org> wrote:
> > >>>> On Sat, 2024-01-13 at 15:47 +0100, Roland Mainz wrote:
> > >>>>> On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 1:19=E2=80=AFAM Dan Shelton <dan.f.shelto=
n@gmail.com> wrote:
[snip]
> Question is... should the values for |ca_*| be a tuneable, or just
> increase the limit to |80| ([1]) ?

Actually a tuneable (which defaults to |80|) would be good, since we
have to test against different configs/kernels anyway, and a tuneable
would help...

----

Bye,
Roland
--=20
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz@nrubsig.org
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /=3D=3D\ O\  TEL +49 641 3992797
 (;O/ \/ \O;)