On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 16:37 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> It's possible, the good case is naturally quite hard to establish with
> 100% certainty. I declared v2.6.26 OK after an uptime of 4 days and 19
> hours, compared with failure normally within 1-2 days. It's possible I
> was premature in doing so. I'll run 2e96d2867 for at least a full week
> before reporting back.
Or it'll reproduce after just a few hours :-/
Looks like a false negative on v2.6.26 -- I'll retest from there.
That secret you've been guarding, isn't.