On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 19:39 -0500, [email protected] wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 16:08 -0800, Matt Helsley wrote:
> > IMHO This seems more incorrect than trying to use a more proximal
> namespace.
>
> You have yet to explain why.
Yes, I know I have to explain why. If you would please have a little
more patience you might see I have replied to your original request for
an explanation -- I *just* sent it out. If I don't see it show up soon
I'll resend it as a reply here. OK?
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 16:57 -0800, Matt Helsley wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 19:39 -0500, [email protected] wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 16:08 -0800, Matt Helsley wrote:
> > > IMHO This seems more incorrect than trying to use a more proximal
> > namespace.
> >
> > You have yet to explain why.
>
> Yes, I know I have to explain why. If you would please have a little
> more patience you might see I have replied to your original request for
> an explanation -- I *just* sent it out. If I don't see it show up soon
> I'll resend it as a reply here. OK?
Sorry if you saw the request twice. My mail server at uio.no appears to
be on the blink, so I switched to the netapp account...
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer
NetApp
[email protected]
http://www.netapp.com