2021-03-09 18:24:58

by Olga Kornievskaia

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/1] NFSD: fix error handling in NFSv4.0 callbacks

If the server's attempts at sending a callback request fails either due
to connection or authentication issues, the server needs to set
NFS4ERR_CB_PATH_DOWN in response to RENEW so that client can recover.

Suggested-by: Bruce Fields <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <[email protected]>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
index 052be5bf9ef5..f436d2ca5223 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
@@ -1186,11 +1186,8 @@ static void nfsd4_cb_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
rpc_restart_call_prepare(task);
return;
case 1:
- switch (task->tk_status) {
- case -EIO:
- case -ETIMEDOUT:
+ if (task->tk_status)
nfsd4_mark_cb_down(clp, task->tk_status);
- }
break;
default:
BUG();
--
2.27.0


2021-03-09 19:25:12

by Chuck Lever

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] NFSD: fix error handling in NFSv4.0 callbacks



> On Mar 9, 2021, at 1:23 PM, Olga Kornievskaia <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> If the server's attempts at sending a callback request fails either due
> to connection or authentication issues, the server needs to set
> NFS4ERR_CB_PATH_DOWN in response to RENEW so that client can recover.
>
> Suggested-by: Bruce Fields <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
> index 052be5bf9ef5..f436d2ca5223 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
> @@ -1186,11 +1186,8 @@ static void nfsd4_cb_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
> rpc_restart_call_prepare(task);
> return;
> case 1:
> - switch (task->tk_status) {
> - case -EIO:
> - case -ETIMEDOUT:
> + if (task->tk_status)

Can task->tk_status ever be positive here? Wondering if we want
a more explicit check like: (task->tk_status < 0)


> nfsd4_mark_cb_down(clp, task->tk_status);
> - }
> break;
> default:
> BUG();
> --
> 2.27.0
>

--
Chuck Lever