Return-Path: <sasai@sm.sony.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 13:35:03 +0900
Message-ID: <8765qysa6g.wl@maple.sm.sony.co.jp>
From: Takashi Sasai <sasai@sm.sony.co.jp>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@rvs.uni-bielefeld.de>
Cc: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>, david.libault@inventel.fr, Daryl Van Vorst <dvpub@telus.net>, bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Halam.Rose@7layers-UK.com
Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] BlueZ Qualification
In-Reply-To: <1046706518.14907.133.camel@linux>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20030227125343.023513a0@mail1.qualcomm.com>
	<5.1.0.14.2.20030228122906.023b3ca8@mail1.qualcomm.com>
	<1046706518.14907.133.camel@linux>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.4 - "Hosorogi")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
List-ID: <bluez-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>

Hi,

> People that already have some experiences in qualification (and
> especially BlueZ) should start now sharing their results with us, so we
> can start planing the next step.

I checked a little ten months ago, but unfortunately I didn't need to
get qualification for now. However I can help and comment by
experiences personally.

Finally it seems that it's duty to sell products in order to get
interoperability and good quality. At least, any companies must do
testing for application profile using final products and get
quarification itself.

I don't know it's really useful, because codes will continue to change
and linux has various platforms, kernel version, CPU, even derivations
with some extensions. Can one quarification cover all of them?
I feel it's good to just confirm core functionarities (l2cap, sdp and
gap for me).

Regards,
Takashi