Return-Path: Subject: RE: [Bluez-devel] Qualification Testing From: Marcel Holtmann To: Daryl Van Vorst Cc: "'Max Krasnyansky'" , "'BlueZ Mailing List'" In-Reply-To: <000801c318d9$1040d500$1a01010a@baked> References: <000801c318d9$1040d500$1a01010a@baked> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1052780723.1132.132.camel@pegasus.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: 13 May 2003 01:05:11 +0200 Hi Daryl, > Cetecom is happy with the decision you guys have made. Sending the error to > syslog so that it can be displayed on the system console and put in the > system log file is good enough. If an app must know, it can monitor syslog. > Everyone's in agreement that this is the right thing to do. > > Having the messages appear on the console is enough to pass testing. We > shouldn't need a special app that monitors syslog. We could submit a copy of > the syslog if necessary. this is good to hear. Another test passed :) Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel