Return-Path: Subject: RE: [Bluez-devel] Qualification Testing From: Marcel Holtmann To: Daryl Van Vorst Cc: "'Max Krasnyansky'" , "'BlueZ Mailing List'" In-Reply-To: <000301c31656$73bb2930$5796fea9@baked> References: <000301c31656$73bb2930$5796fea9@baked> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1052505389.1214.74.camel@pegasus.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: 09 May 2003 20:36:21 +0200 Hi Daryl, > Not sure if you saw a slightly more recent post from me. The test isn't > quite as stupid as it seems. When the tester rejects the config request, it > gives desired configuration values inside that response. We're supposed to > return those values in the next config request (providing we like them well > enough). It'll accept those values. This behaviour makes sense to me now. > Thoughts? I have seen your post, but I don't have started to look deeper into it. > I sent a raw HCI dump for the two test cases in another message to the list > yesterday. Is that enough information? Please send me the binary dump file, because it is easier for me to work with it. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel