Return-Path: Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030612120846.0ba3b5c8@unixmail.qualcomm.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 12:11:32 -0700 To: "Daryl Van Vorst" , "'Marcel Holtmann'" From: Max Krasnyansky Subject: RE: [Bluez-devel] Qualification Testing Cc: "'BlueZ Mailing List'" In-Reply-To: <000c01c33113$6aaf0320$1a01010a@baked> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20030612102711.0b283180@unixmail.qualcomm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" List-ID: At 11:49 AM 6/12/2003, Daryl Van Vorst wrote: >> >Apparently, in step 3 above, if we send a config request with no >> >options it will also pass the test. How silly is that? (specially >> >considering that's what we send by default in the first place!) >> I'm pretty sure that it's just because they use some dumb >> tester implementation. It doesn't make sense to resend the >> same config request. > >It's actually written that way in the test case. Here's a quote from the >updated test case (errata correction ID 241): > >"Pass Verdict: The IUT sends an L2CAP_ConfigReq with acceptable values >received in the L2CAP_ConfigRsp with Result = Failure - unacceptable >parameters, or the L2CAP_ConfigReq contains no options." Consider it done then :). Sounds like this will be useful for other folks to pass qualification. I'll put it in. Max