Return-Path: <noring@nocrew.org>
Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] D-Bus interfaces
From: Fredrik Noring <noring@nocrew.org>
To: Philip Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
   Fred Sch??ttgen <bluez-devel@schaettgen.de>,
   BlueZ Mailing List <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <1077064144.685.16.camel@dixie.nexus.co.uk>
References: <1076265358.2670.36.camel@pegasus>
	 <1076278554.14742.112.camel@akka.yeti.nocrew.org>
	 <1076279508.6869.54.camel@pegasus>
	 <200402090015.24318.bluez-devel@schaettgen.de>
	 <20040216144615.GA318@nexus.co.uk> <1076945776.17824.6.camel@merlin>
	 <20040216154155.GB32285@nexus.co.uk>  <1077058771.2665.134.camel@pegasus>
	 <1077061102.685.0.camel@dixie.nexus.co.uk>
	 <1077061494.2665.148.camel@pegasus>
	 <1077061750.685.3.camel@dixie.nexus.co.uk>
	 <1077062239.2665.153.camel@pegasus>
	 <1077062886.685.8.camel@dixie.nexus.co.uk>
	 <1077063432.2665.165.camel@pegasus>
	 <1077064144.685.16.camel@dixie.nexus.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1077206112.20897.156.camel@kalkyl.roxen.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:55:12 +0100
List-ID: <bluez-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>

Hi Philip

ons 2004-02-18 klockan 01.29 skrev Philip Blundell:
> I agree that it's just a name, but I don't think it's necessarily
> appropriate for us to use the Bluetooth name just because that's the
> underlying technology.

I too had this discussion with Marcel on this list a week ago and I
agree with you: "org.bluez" appears to be the proper D-Bus prefix.

Fredrik