From: "Nicholas A. Preyss" <nalp@gmx.net>
To: BlueZ Mailing List <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] Questions about BlueZ in  commercial use
Message-ID: <20040627191016.GA26191@gmx.net>
References: <003401c45c2b$b6eab240$0364a8c0@haruo> <1088359746.3774.20.camel@pegasus>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <1088359746.3774.20.camel@pegasus>
Sender: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:10:16 +0200

On  0, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> wrote:
> > Why doesn't BlueZ have a "stable version"?
> > Do you have any plan to have a "stable version" of BlueZ?
> 
> That is wrong. BlueZ itself is stable. Speaking about the kernel part
> then every code in a stable kernel like 2.4 and 2.6 is stable. Bugs
> exists and later kernel releases are more stable than previous, but
> every BlueZ code in the kernel can be considered as stable.

I wouldn't consider 2.6. as stable. And i think it is not recommend to
use anything related to USB with 2.6. in a commercial standalone device.

nicholas


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel