Return-Path: Message-ID: <20040716140215.564.qmail@webmail2.aruba.it> References: <20040618175410.28510.qmail@webmail.aruba.it> <1087582530.4309.121.camel@pegasus> <20040618183339.20830.qmail@webmail.aruba.it> <1087583875.25061.2.camel@pegasus> <20040618184232.25439.qmail@webmail.aruba.it> <1087584576.25061.6.camel@pegasus> In-Reply-To: <1087584576.25061.6.camel@pegasus> From: "ubaldo" To: Marcel Holtmann Cc: BlueZ Mailing List Subject: Re: multi rfcomm/sco connection Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:02:15 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1" List-ID: Ciao Marcel, > actually I don't see why you need more than one SCO link in a connection > between two devices. However take a look at the kernel source code of > Linux 2.6.x and especially at net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c I explain you a bit more my situation... I need to be able with a single usb-bt-dongle to play/capture audio for several bt-handsfree, I tried with one and there are no problems, but if I try to connect another one then I get something like "sco channel busy". I studied the net/bluetooth directory but I cannot find any good way to achieve what I need! :) Am I wrong in something or is this feature really missing?