Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] RFCOMM service level security testing
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Stephen Crane <steve.crane@rococosoft.com>
Cc: BlueZ Mailing List <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <1099495689.3265.44.camel@baroque.rococosoft.com>
References: <1099151759.16247.18.camel@pegasus>
	 <1099433039.7125.13.camel@pegasus>
	 <1099495689.3265.44.camel@baroque.rococosoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1099496238.6330.2.camel@notepaq>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 16:37:18 +0100

Hi Steve,

> I've run our basic RFComm server-side security tests against 2.6.9-mh3
> and they all seem to pass (previously they'd all failed of course). Nice
> work!

thanks for testing and what do you think, should I put this feature into
the next stable kernel?

Another question is what should we do when the encryption on a link with
RFCOMM_ENCRYPT is switched off? At the moment L2CAP keeps works, but in
the RFCOMM layer I drop the connection by sending DM.

Regards

Marcel


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel