Return-Path: Subject: RE: [Bluez-devel] Qualification testing. From: Marcel Holtmann To: BlueZ Mailing List In-Reply-To: <001a01c4d7d9$4c61a800$1a01010a@baked> References: <001a01c4d7d9$4c61a800$1a01010a@baked> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1101929562.15615.23.camel@pegasus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Reply-To: bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: BlueZ development List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 20:32:41 +0100 Hi Daryl, > I got word back on one of the unmentioned bugs and it appears to be a bug in > the tester. So now there is only one outstanding item. I don't see why this > is a failure: > > CFD/BV-01: > Tester sends an l2cap config request in two pieces (using continuation flag) > to the IUT. The tester expects to see one of two alternatives: > > 1. The IUT includes in the response to each request the requested options. > 2. The IUT first sends an empty response and in its second response it sends > all the requested options. > > We currently just send two empty responses. I think an empty response would > be acceptable if all the requested options were in one request, so I don't > see why this fails. do you have a hcidump or another trace for me? > > to be honest, I am already aware of this problem. I ran into it when I > > first started to look at the support for L2CAP retransmission and flow > > control. Our current way of handling the configuration must be changed > > to deal better with L2CAP 1.2 devices and their features. It > > is not that > > easy to change and my time was too limited for it. However I > > am open for > > any ideas and I am sorry to say that, but your patch looks > > like a dirty > > hack. > > Ah yes, the expected response. ;) But you are right, it is a bit of a hack. > As far as I can see it's either going to be a hack or a rewrite of that > config request handling code. Do you have a better solution? Not at the moment and maybe not so fast. This needs a little bit more work. > Is QoS one of the things you're thinking of? Actually no. However this might come for free. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel