Return-Path: From: zze-COLBUS Emmanuel RD-MAPS-GRE To: bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Message-Id: <1108566885.11909.29.camel@g-necml5-146.rd.francetelecom.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Bluez-devel] Code questions Sender: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Reply-To: bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: BlueZ development List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:14:45 +0100 Hello, I've looked to the code of BlueTooth in the linux 2.6.10 kernel, and I've a few questions : - I've noticed that OCF_PIN_CODE_REPLY and OCF_PIN_CODE_NEG_REPLY are defined in include/net/bluetooth/hci.h, but never used in the code; and that the function hci_pin_code_request_evt() is void. Does it mean that the current BlueZ implementation doesn't support PIN codes? (Just making sure.) - Is the PIN Code Request event masked away (I think it is, because I also read the BlueTooth Specification, and it doesn't allow not reacting to this event), and in this case, were is it masked? I didn't found the masking in the code. - I've noticed the same for other events (that they were not treated). Are they also just masked away, and, if yes, were in the code do this masking happens? Emmanuel Colbus -- Please don't care about this useless mail signature: M. Emmanuel Colbus de l'ENSIMAG intervenant ? FTRD/MAPS/AMS du 01/02/05 au 30/06/05 sous la responsabilit? de M. Tahar Jarboui dans le cadre d'un stage de fin d'?tudes. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel