Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] BlueZ investigation
From: Charles Bueche <charles@bueche.ch>
To: bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
In-Reply-To: <425E9118.7040101@palmsource.com>
References: <425E9118.7040101@palmsource.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1113510010.11953.13.camel@bluez.bueche.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Reply-To: bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 22:20:10 +0200

Hi Fred,

you would be wise to use bluez for at least the following 2 reasons :

- it's delivered with the stock kernel, so you won't depend on a vendor
for updates
- my T5 crashes too often while I do Bluetooth operations. Don't know
what you have been used until now in PalmOs, but Bluez is magnitudes
better in stability.

my 2ct worth.
Charles

On jeu, 2005-04-14 at 17:49 +0200, Frederic Danis wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In our move to Linux, we are investigating different Bluetooth stacks 
> (proprietary or free).
> About BlueZ, I am asked about interoperability issues: do you know if 
> there are companies attending the unplugged fests to test their 
> BlueZ-based products? Do you have info about commercial devices 
> interoperating with BlueZ?
> Please, send me any comments that can help me to decide my managment.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Fred


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel