Return-Path: Message-ID: <3013cac80511250643s30a3e836qb9559289e68ee75c@mail.gmail.com> From: Eduardo Rocha To: bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [Bluez-devel] Device scan property Sender: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Reply-To: bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: BlueZ development List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:43:31 -0300 Hi Marcel, Johan and Claudio, I'm going to start the scan property implementation for device path now. From early discussions, I think we have agreeded to split page scan and inquire scan property. Starting to think in implementation now, I realized that this imply in an extra getdeviceinfo, as we have to now if the exactly page flag status to modify it. If we join this two properties into scan property, with 2 boolean parameters for pscan and iscan, we can eliminate this operation. What do you guys think? BR, Eduardo. -- Eduardo Rocha Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia - INdT ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel