Return-Path: From: Marcel Holtmann To: BlueZ development In-Reply-To: <45232AE9.40605@xmission.com> References: <4521D857.8000705@vasmac.com> <45232AE9.40605@xmission.com> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 10:27:33 +0200 Message-Id: <1159950453.1601.5.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] SCO packet processing Reply-To: BlueZ development List-Id: BlueZ development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Hi Brad, > > I realize SCO handling has not been a priority and it sort of works. > > Is there much interest in getting it right? > > I'm very interested in it but I've only been able to address the > application side of things. It looks like you've dug in and reached a > decent understanding of where problems are. > > Developers of embedded systems are passing linux/bluez over because > voice is too important to just have it "mostly" work. > > It's unfortunate that Fabien is not still working at it too. I was > hoping he would keep a dialog going long enough to find an approach that > Marcel likes but it seems like Fabien got tired of pushing it. I am happy about any patches, but they must be clean and preferable not breaking any kernel<->userspace API. Improving the SCO support would be really nice. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel