Return-Path: From: Marcel Holtmann To: BlueZ development In-Reply-To: <1165849742.5344.75.camel@ODole-Ubuntu> References: <1165849102.5344.71.camel@ODole-Ubuntu> <1165849386.20733.9.camel@localhost> <1165849742.5344.75.camel@ODole-Ubuntu> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:51:25 +0100 Message-Id: <1165870285.20733.19.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] PAN profile BUG? Reply-To: BlueZ development List-Id: BlueZ development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Hi Olivier, > The problem from my point of view is that if you run a PANU server (so > no need of Ethernet bridging), you must only have one slave and you are > able to have 2 slaves (or more) connected to the server... Even if that > is not really a bug, it does not strictly follow PAN specifications. so you wanna have a mode that stops listening on the PSM 15 when it has a bnep0 connection and starts again once this connection has been terminated. It is doable, but I am not sure if it is worth changing the source code this way and first you have to convince me that we would fail the qualification tests if we keep supporting this. Otherwise it is a nice feature of BlueZ, because all this UUID stuff in the BNEP specification is crap anyway. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel