Return-Path: Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:50:00 +0800 From: amateur To: BlueZ users , bluez-devel Message-ID: <20061209015000.GD3119@163.com> References: <20061208084508.GA3317@163.com> <1165573471.5529.24.camel@aeonflux.holtmann.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1165573471.5529.24.camel@aeonflux.holtmann.net> Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] [Bluez-users] How to setup a reliable RFCOMM connection Reply-To: amateur , BlueZ development List-Id: BlueZ development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 11:24:31AM +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi, > > > How to setup a reliable RFCOMM connection, that is, a connection with > > infinite flush timeout. I find the RFCOMM_LM_RELIABLE option in the > > example program l2test.c. It compiles, but at runtime setsockopt with > > RFCOMM_LM give me an error. I'm using kernel-2.4.21 patched by > > patch-2.4.21-mh10. So what's the problem. Doesn't kernel-2.4.21-mh10 > > support RFCOMM_LM? If so, how can I setup a reliable RFCOMM connection? > > the RFCOMM channels are always reliable. No need for any other options. > Does that mean that the Automatic Flush Timeout Timer for the L2CAP connection underlying the RFCOMM connection is set to 0xFFFF by default? And when does the RFCOMM_LM option introduced? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel