Return-Path: From: Marcel Holtmann To: BlueZ development In-Reply-To: <460D363F.9010709@access-company.com> References: <45F16630.9000606@access-company.com> <460D363F.9010709@access-company.com> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:13:08 +0200 Message-Id: <1175271188.5815.225.camel@violet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] RemoteNameRequested signal during discovery patch Reply-To: BlueZ development List-Id: BlueZ development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Hi Frederic, > A new version of the patch. > Are you okay with it ? the patch looks okay to me. However I prefer if Claudio or Johan can have an additional look. My question is why this signal is actually needed. Please elaborate on the use cases of this signal. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel