Return-Path: Message-ID: <46812123.4030908@free.fr> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:22:27 +0200 From: Fabien Chevalier MIME-Version: 1.0 To: BlueZ development References: <467FD4DF.9090108@free.fr> <1182808431.6385.30.camel@aeonflux.holtmann.net> In-Reply-To: <1182808431.6385.30.camel@aeonflux.holtmann.net> Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] Kernel vs Userland AVDTP Reply-To: BlueZ development List-Id: BlueZ development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Hi Marcel, > at some point, yes. Currently it makes no sense to start with a kernel > version of AVDTP. Also Bluetooth 2.1 and 3.0 are gonna have high impact > on L2CAP and I wanna have that settled first before considering a kernel > based AVDTP, because it is not that simple. It would be as complex as > RFCOMM and so keeping it in userspace is better for now. > I would tend to agree with you, specially on the fact that it would be quite complex to implement. But what about a user space library? Do you thing that would make sense ? Cheers, Fabien ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel