Return-Path:
Message-ID:
From: Robert Rawlins
To: BlueZ development
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:11:14 +0000
In-Reply-To: <200801182017.36181.chick@computergeek.freeserve.co.uk>
References:
<200801182017.36181.chick@computergeek.freeserve.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] Same Old Speed Issues
Reply-To: BlueZ development
List-Id: BlueZ development
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1471283814=="
Sender: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
--===============1471283814==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_5c2aa693-e333-42a2-a38e-f66364440fbf_"
--_5c2aa693-e333-42a2-a38e-f66364440fbf_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Guys,
=20
I've been playing around with this again today, looking into ALC MTU's and =
things like that but really can't find any resources to suggest why I might=
be getting such poor speeds, I thought it would be a plug-and-play kinds o=
f affair.=20
=20
I also made an effort to try a couple of other kernel versions, just in cas=
e, but they all gave the same results as 2.6.23.
=20
Thanks for any further advice guys. Is it worth me giving you some HCI_DUMP=
information? Is that likely to hold any clues as to what's going wrong?
=20
Cheers,
=20
Rob
> From: chick@computergeek.freeserve.co.uk> To: bluez-devel@lists.sourcefor=
ge.net> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:17:35 +0000> Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] S=
ame Old Speed Issues> > On Friday 18 January 2008 15:04:58 Robert Rawlins w=
rote:> > At the moment I've tried using both ussp-push and open-obex push c=
lients to> > transfer the file, both giving me the same results. I'm achiev=
ing roughly> > 25Kbytes/s transfer speed both up and down. I've tried runni=
ng these same> > dongles from my Windows PC and achieve well over 100kBytes=
/s. (This is> > transmitting to a Sony k850i handset which is v2.0 + EDR). =
This would lead> > me to believe its not an issue with the Dongle, more lik=
ely something with> > my Linux configuration> >> > Have you tried changing =
the OBEX block size - try forcing the minimum size to > 64kB-1?> > Cheers,>=
Tim> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------=
--------> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft> Defy all challenges=
. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse01200000=
70mrt/direct/01/> _______________________________________________> Bluez-de=
vel mailing list> Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> https://lists.sourcefo=
rge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
_________________________________________________________________
Share what Santa brought you
https://www.mycooluncool.com=
--_5c2aa693-e333-42a2-a38e-f66364440fbf_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Guys,=
I've been playing around with this ag=
ain today, looking into ALC MTU's and things like that but really can't fin=
d any resources to suggest why I might be getting such poor speeds, I thoug=
ht it would be a plug-and-play kinds of affair. =
FONT>
I also made an effort to try a couple=
of other kernel versions, just in case, but they all gave the same results=
as 2.6.23.
Thanks for any further advice guys. I=
s it worth me giving you some HCI_DUMP information? Is that likely to hold =
any clues as to what's going wrong?
Cheers,
Rob
> From: chick@computergeek.freeserve.co.uk
> To: bluez-devel@lists=
.sourceforge.net
> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:17:35 +0000
> Subj=
ect: Re: [Bluez-devel] Same Old Speed Issues
>
> On Friday 18 =
January 2008 15:04:58 Robert Rawlins wrote:
> > At the moment I've=
tried using both ussp-push and open-obex push clients to
> > tran=
sfer the file, both giving me the same results. I'm achieving roughly
&g=
t; > 25Kbytes/s transfer speed both up and down. I've tried running thes=
e same
> > dongles from my Windows PC and achieve well over 100kBy=
tes/s. (This is
> > transmitting to a Sony k850i handset which is =
v2.0 + EDR). This would lead
> > me to believe its not an issue wi=
th the Dongle, more likely something with
> > my Linux configurati=
on
> >
>
> Have you tried changing the OBEX block siz=
e - try forcing the minimum size to
> 64kB-1?
>
> Cheer=
s,
> Tim
>
>
> ----------------------------------=
---------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponso=
red by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2=
008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>=
; _______________________________________________
> Bluez-devel maili=
ng list
> Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sou=
rceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
Everything in on=
e place. =
All new Windows Live!
=
--_5c2aa693-e333-42a2-a38e-f66364440fbf_--
--===============1471283814==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
--===============1471283814==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
--===============1471283814==--