Return-Path: From: Marcel Holtmann To: BlueZ development In-Reply-To: References: <1202220823.15090.88.camel@violet> <1202221797.15090.93.camel@violet> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:08:17 +0100 Message-Id: <1202231297.15090.109.camel@violet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] bluez+dbus: why glib binding Reply-To: BlueZ development List-Id: BlueZ development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Hi Choi, > > > If not - what do you use instead ? directly the libdus C lowlevel library ? > > > or some other binding ? > > > IOW - is it possible to use glib binding without dbus-glib ? > > > > You don't get it. The dbus-glib bindings are an integration of dbus into > > the GObject model (libgobject). We don't use that. Yes, we use glib, but > > not gobject and yes, we use dbus (low-level libdbus). > > Ok, I think I understand. > In bluez-utils, which is a d-bus server, you use directly the libdbus library, > just like dbus-daemon does. So the glib is required for completely > different reasons - not > for using dbus. am I correct ? we need the mainloop from glib to make dbus work. Otherwise we would have to write our own mainloop and that is nasty. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel