Return-Path: Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:21:37 +0200 From: "Choi Sonim" To: "BlueZ development" In-Reply-To: <1202220823.15090.88.camel@violet> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1202220823.15090.88.camel@violet> Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] bluez+dbus: why glib binding Reply-To: BlueZ development List-Id: BlueZ development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Hi Marcel, On Feb 5, 2008 4:13 PM, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > We use glib for the mainloop, the XML parser and other things. Does glib impose a big memory footprint on the system or is it ok for embedded systems ? > We will have hard dependencies on dbus and glib (not dbus-glib). Maybe I'm confusing terms - but don't you use dbus' glib binding (isn't that dbus-glib?) ? If not - what do you use instead ? directly the libdus C lowlevel library ? or some other binding ? IOW - is it possible to use glib binding without dbus-glib ? thank you very much - you are very helpful ! choi ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel