Return-Path: From: Marcel Holtmann To: BlueZ development In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:13:43 +0100 Message-Id: <1202220823.15090.88.camel@violet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] bluez+dbus: why glib binding Reply-To: BlueZ development List-Id: BlueZ development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Hi Choi, > i am intersted to understand why did bluez daemon choose to use the > glib binding of dbus. the bluez-utils don't depend on dbus-glib. It is an option that we use for testing and nothing more. > i understand it is easier than the low level c library. > > but - doesn't glib impose a new depedanbility ? > > and - does the bluez daemon use glib for something other than dbus ? We use glib for the mainloop, the XML parser and other things. However currently you can configure it to use the included eglib which means you don't have to depend on glib. However the option to use eglib will go away with the 4.x series. We will have hard dependencies on dbus and glib (not dbus-glib). Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel