Return-Path: Message-ID: <47E248FF.60402@infitsrl.com> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:22:39 +0100 From: Fabrizio Guglielmino MIME-Version: 1.0 To: BlueZ development References: <1e720e88bd7ce5a74be321703f24060d@i61813> In-Reply-To: Subject: [Bluez-devel] RFCOMM sockets Reply-To: BlueZ development List-Id: BlueZ development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Hi all, I have 3 embedded devices with temperature sensor. This devices are accessed from a pc with linux reading data with rfcomm socket, isn't need to make sdp query for channel because rfcomm channels are statically assigned (it's lab equipment). I need to read the 3 devices almost at same time and I've done a little C application using GLib IOChannels and non-blocking socket to read data from the devices. All works fine but if a device it's off the connection to the others it's slow, my impression is it waits timeout from the first device. I can understand why if I have 3 rfcomm connections issued in non-blocking way these influences each other. I'm using BlueZ 3.22 on a debian 4.0 whith kernel version 2.6.22 Thanks ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel