Return-Path: Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 08:54:05 -0700 From: "Andrew Jorgensen" To: "BlueZ development" In-Reply-To: <1204800991.13254.8.camel@californication> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1204800991.13254.8.camel@californication> Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] CreateSecureDevice Reply-To: BlueZ development List-Id: BlueZ development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Marcel Holtmann > > Aren't you maintaining bluez-gnome? Could you add this fallback to > > properties/input.c? > > feel free to send a patch :) Trouble is that it doesn't return anything, it just segfaults. Probably it's being called in some wrong way. I might look at it someday but given that I can just remove 'Secure' if bluez-utils is too old I think I'll just leave the package patched. > > I'm curious what you mean by "would have broken the API." Do you mean > > if we were to remove the method now after it has been released? If so > > then I agree, it's too late. > > We can't add any parameters to an already established method call. And > there are cases were we wanna use a device in an unpaired way. There can be an input device that can be used in either paired or unpaired mode as desired? I wouldn't have thought any such thing existed, but if that's so then I agree and am sorry to have troubled you about it. Thanks, Andrew ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel