Return-Path: Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 15:40:54 -0700 From: "Andrew Jorgensen" To: "BlueZ development" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] CreateSecureDevice Reply-To: BlueZ development List-Id: BlueZ development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Marcel Holtmann > yes, it is too later and it would have broken the API. If > CreateSecureDevice returns with no such method error, you can always > fallback to CreateDevice. Hi Marcel, Aren't you maintaining bluez-gnome? Could you add this fallback to properties/input.c? I'm curious what you mean by "would have broken the API." Do you mean if we were to remove the method now after it has been released? If so then I agree, it's too late. But I'm curious why a new method was added rather than new functionality to the existing method. Are there new callbacks that would have broken existing clients? I guess it's a moot point now though. Thanks, Andrew ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel