Return-Path: <cyrus@holtmann.org>
Message-ID: <fb2ac3c90803041411k3ea1426cib1e729b19053adce@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 15:11:52 -0700
From: "Andrew Jorgensen" <andrew.jorgensen@gmail.com>
To: bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [Bluez-devel] CreateSecureDevice
Reply-To: BlueZ development <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Id: BlueZ development <bluez-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel>,
	<mailto:bluez-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bluez-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bluez-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel>,
	<mailto:bluez-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net

Hello,

I was wondering why there is a CreateDevice in org.bluez.input.Manager
if CreateSecureDevice will fall back to the same behavior if the
device in question does not support secure pairing.

bluez-gnome switched to CreateSecureDevice after that method was added
which broke users who still had older bluez-utils (no changes to
require a newer bluez-utils were made).  Would it not have been better
to just add the security routines to the existing CreateDevice?  Is it
too late to change this now?

Best Regards,
Andrew Jorgensen

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel