Return-Path: From: Marcel Holtmann To: BlueZ development In-Reply-To: <066701c8de28$51a90a70$6701a8c0@freqonedev> References: <066701c8de28$51a90a70$6701a8c0@freqonedev> Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 19:03:38 +0200 Message-Id: <1215277418.4349.1.camel@californication> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] One more suggestion regarding Agent Reply-To: BlueZ development List-Id: BlueZ development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Hi David, > There may be a valid use-case to allow for the Agent to be a separate > process. However, there needs to be a way to designate the BusName of > the connection from the other Agent process to the System bus. I really have no idea what you are talking about. The agent can always be a separate process. The agent for CreatePairedDevice must be the same process as the caller. That is on purpose. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel