Return-Path: From: Marcel Holtmann To: BlueZ development In-Reply-To: <001501c9381a$022b7f40$06827dc0$@de> References: <001501c9381a$022b7f40$06827dc0$@de> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:03:43 +0100 Message-Id: <1225130623.7157.10.camel@californication> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: 'Frans de Bont' Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] Bad encoding performance of Linux SBC audio codec Reply-To: BlueZ development List-Id: BlueZ development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Errors-To: bluez-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Hi Christian, > I have made some extensive study on the compression performance of Linux's > SBC audio codec in comparison to the reference implementation. > > I am sorry to say that the audio quality of the open source version of SBC > is far worse than the reference implementation. > > Can anybody confirm these results? > Do you have any idea why the performance is so worse? are you talking about the encoder or the decoder. For the encoder, I can't see the big difference. For the decoder you can clearly hear that we get the volume wrong. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel