Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] Slaves in Sniff mode
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: tOpSy TuRvY <topsyturvy@nemo.student.utwente.nl>
Cc: BlueZ Mailing List <bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.58.0406231319140.20827@nemo.student.utwente.nl>
References: <E1BcqIi-0002cT-53@sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net>
	 <Pine.BSO.4.58.0406222046050.9882@nemo.student.utwente.nl>
	 <1087939830.4209.12.camel@pegasus>
	 <Pine.BSO.4.58.0406222346200.5451@nemo.student.utwente.nl>
	 <1087942444.4209.45.camel@pegasus>
	 <Pine.BSO.4.58.0406231319140.20827@nemo.student.utwente.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1087992990.4209.79.camel@pegasus>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:16:30 +0200

Hi Assed,

> Does anyone know if the master delays ACL transmittions to slaves in sniff 
> mode (i.e. till they become active again), or will it just keep on 
> transmitting the baseband frame till the slave eventually wakes up and can 
> send an ACK.

the master should request an unsiff before it sends the next ACL packet.

Regards

Marcel


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Bluez-users mailing list
Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users