Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] Which fedora core?
From: Philip Barnes <phil@trig222.f9.co.uk>
To: bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
In-Reply-To: <1100769119.7164.17.camel@pegasus>
References: <cnhnd6$toe$1@sea.gmane.org>  <1100769119.7164.17.camel@pegasus>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1100798738.3439.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Reply-To: bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:25:38 +0000

On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 10:11 +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > I've been reading through your posts and I see people working with fedora. I
> > plan to install a Fedora distribution in order to bring bluetooth to life,
> > but my doubt is which core: core 3 or core 2. On the one hand I guess that
> > core 2 is already hardly tested by some of you, and you could help me easier
> > if I fall in a jam and ask for mercy. On the other, maybe core 3 is more
> > updated in terms of patches and so on.
> > So what is your advice for me? -don't have to convince me, just your
> > intuition would be wellcome.
> 
> use the Fedora Core 3. It is already outdated, but it is a way better
> than Core 2.
> 
I would say use core 2, it works....

I upgraded to core 3 last week, and I have not been able to get my palm
pilot to connect since. I think its due to bluez-sdp being missing from
the core 3 distro, but I'm still working on the problem.

HTH Phil 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
_______________________________________________
Bluez-users mailing list
Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users