Return-Path: From: Peter Johanson To: bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20050114063841.GB23441@butchy.cubesearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [Bluez-users] Philips PC Card + 2.6.10 kernel. Sender: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Reply-To: bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: BlueZ users List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:38:41 -0800 (Resent, as it was sent from the wrong address the first time) Hey all, I'm working on getting a newly aquired Philips PC Card working, using a 2.6.10 kernel (-gentoo-r4 to be specific). I believe i've run into the problem as described here (and as potentially fixed for some -mmX sources): http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=9953048, which claimed to be resolved for 2.6.10-rc1-mm2, which I also gave a try, but was unable to actually test, as my keyboard refused to work with that kernel. I've also tried 2.6.10-mm2, with the same failure. Here's the info on the card: lspci -vvv for the card: 0000:03:00.0 Serial controller: Oxford Semiconductor Ltd OXCB950 Cardbus 16950 UART (prog-if 06 [16950]) Subsystem: Oxford Semiconductor Ltd: Unknown device 0001 Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- SERR- dmesg, after implementing the small patch discussed here to recognize the card http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/linux/linux-kernel/2002-08/1374.html: PCI: Enabling device 0000:03:00.0 (0000 -> 0003) ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:03:00.0[A] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11 ttyS14: detected caps 00000700 should be 00000100 ttyS14 at I/O 0x4010 (irq = 11) is a 16C950/954 Having found the specs based on the FCC ID on the FCC site, i know this is the OXford Semiconductor chipset with a BlueCore01 inside. As such, I tried: gonzo root # hciattach /dev/ttyS14 bcsp 921600 BCSP initialization timed out Was there ever any success in finding out what had changed for the user who reported success for 2.6.10-r1-mm2? Any suggestions on ways to debug this? Thanks in advance. -pete -- Peter Johanson ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Bluez-users mailing list Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users