Return-Path: Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] Question re .bind() call on an RFCOMM socket From: Marcel Holtmann To: BlueZ Mailing List In-Reply-To: <0AAF93247C75E3408638B965DEE11A70026375D1@i2km41-ukdy.domain1.systemhost.net> References: <0AAF93247C75E3408638B965DEE11A70026375D1@i2km41-ukdy.domain1.systemhost.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1105469794.7961.21.camel@pegasus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Reply-To: bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: BlueZ users List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:56:34 +0100 Hi Graeme, > I am trying to understand how bind() call to BlueZ RFCOMM socket > behaves . > > If the loc_addr.rc_channel were set to 0, does the bind() call > automatically allocate an unused RFCOMM server channel ? if you use the latest kernel then it will select the next unused RFCOMM channel. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Bluez-users mailing list Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users