Return-Path: Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] Some documentation From: Marcel Holtmann To: BlueZ Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20050228180217.44458.qmail@web26404.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <20050228180217.44458.qmail@web26404.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1109614501.17256.119.camel@pegasus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Reply-To: bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: BlueZ users List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:15:01 +0100 Hi Imad, > > the core architecture is different, because BlueZ > > hardware is not a network device. > > Wath do you mean? > > >The IrDA stack made this mistake and > > so did Affix. The > > BlueZ uses its own hardware interface. > > wich one ? hci_usb.c? affix also have one: btusb.c > > >Our driver interface is a lot much cleaner. > > Can you give more details? check the mailing list archive for a detailed analysis from Max. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Bluez-users mailing list Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users