Return-Path: From: "Fintan McEvoy" To: Subject: RE: [Bluez-users] Bluetooth 1.2 device Message-ID: <002501c54bef$4c4feae0$d24bc988@computernetworks> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <4270D347.1030204@gmx.ch> Sender: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Reply-To: bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: BlueZ users List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:39:19 +0100 Thanks a million Marco, You have answered all my questions, Help is much appreciated. Regards, Fintan -----Original Message----- From: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Marco Trudel Sent: 28 April 2005 13:13 To: bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] Bluetooth 1.2 device Hello Fintan Fintan McEvoy wrote: > Hi, > I'm sure this is a common question but I'm looking for a bluetooth > version 1.2 device that works well with bluez and under a kernel not > over 2.4.29 . Can anyone make a good suggestion. Options I have looked > at so far include DBT-120 and upgrading firmware. The D-Link DBT-120 will probably be the best choice. After an firmware update you have to reset it to hci bootmode (or use hid2hci). Marcel wrote the pskey tool for this, it's in the cvs. > Questions I have about > that include, do I need a MAC to do this No. There are a lot of utilities for windows to do that. Widcomm (I think > 3.0) has an updater included. I always use that. There's also the btdfu tool for linux, but as much as I know it's not that recommended. I would suggest the widcomm one. > and will it work with 2.4.29 . yes. > In fact will it work with Bluez at all this way. The other device I have > looked at is the newly SIG approved F8T009 belkin device. This seems to > use Broadcom BCM2035 chipset. Broadcom's don't work that great with bluez. If you can, you really should avoid them. > I think Bluez works when this chipset uses > Bluetooth v1.1 . Is this correct? Will it work if it is using v 1.2 . there are problem with both. > I really do need to get a bluetooth 1.2 device that works as > I'm setting up a testbed for research here in University of Limerick, > Ireland. Any suggestions on what device to buy will be greatly > appreciated. regards Marco ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix _______________________________________________ Bluez-users mailing list Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix _______________________________________________ Bluez-users mailing list Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users