Message-ID: <426E0C5A.8060203@gmx.ch>
From: Marco Trudel <mtrudel@gmx.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject: [Bluez-users] implementing security mode 2 or 3
Sender: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Reply-To: bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:39:38 +0200

Sorry for double-posting. I sent this email already but it seems it never 
reached the list...


Hello

I've two rfcomm service running on different channels.
I wish to have one channel authenticated/encrypted, the other
unathenticated(unencrypted).

As much as I know, that means that security mode 3 won't work, security
mode 2 has to be used and I've to program this myself.

Does this mean that I've to request authentication/encryption on incoming
connections? How can I do that using bluez?
Will this provide less security/encryption than using security mode 3?

regards
Marco


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bluez-users mailing list
Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users