Return-Path: <bluez-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <c49421c50609081259x6baeae03i5459121accf53a21@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 16:59:02 -0300
From: "Loreno Oliveira" <lorenooliveira@gmail.com>
To: "BlueZ users" <bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060828103232.1f50b8ea@debian>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20060821134723.68c21ab8@debian>
	<1156168504.3956.27.camel@aeonflux.holtmann.net>
	<loom.20060821T180305-246@post.gmane.org>
	<loom.20060825T104609-996@post.gmane.org>
	<44EF0CCB.4010103@xmission.com> <20060825171443.4549dd33@debian>
	<20060828103232.1f50b8ea@debian>
Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR dongle
Reply-To: BlueZ users <bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Id: BlueZ users <bluez-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users>,
	<mailto:bluez-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=bluez-users>
List-Post: <mailto:bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bluez-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users>,
	<mailto:bluez-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1629989906=="
Sender: bluez-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: bluez-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net

--===============1629989906==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_8499_15395220.1157745542633"

------=_Part_8499_15395220.1157745542633
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I know this thread is over since a while, but I have one doubt:

is there any difference regarding compatibility with bluez between Bluetake
BT007 and BT009 families?
The point is that I need class 2 devices, and no class 1.

Regards,

Loreno

On 8/28/06, automatic_jack <automatic_jack@katamail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:14:43 +0200
> automatic_jack <automatic_jack@katamail.com> wrote:
>
> > I have also seen the Bluetake bt007sx dongle (bluetooth 2.0 + edr),
> > are there any differences between the EX and SX? Maybe the chipset...
>
> Bluetake has written to me that there is no difference on chipset. The
> difference is only on software (BT007EX is Toshiba; BT007/9SX is IVT).
>
> Regards,
>
> jack
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Bluez-users mailing list
> Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users
>

------=_Part_8499_15395220.1157745542633
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I know this thread is over since a while, but I have one doubt:<br><br>is there any difference regarding compatibility with bluez between Bluetake BT007 and BT009 families?<br>The point is that I need class 2 devices, and no class 1.
<br><br>Regards,<br><br>Loreno<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/28/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">automatic_jack</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:automatic_jack@katamail.com">automatic_jack@katamail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:14:43 +0200<br>automatic_jack &lt;<a href="mailto:automatic_jack@katamail.com">
automatic_jack@katamail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br><br>&gt; I have also seen the Bluetake bt007sx dongle (bluetooth 2.0 + edr),<br>&gt; are there any differences between the EX and SX? Maybe the chipset...<br><br>Bluetake has written to me that there is no difference on chipset. The
<br>difference is only on software (BT007EX is Toshiba; BT007/9SX is IVT).<br><br>Regards,<br><br>jack<br><br>-------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
<br>Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier<br>Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo<br><a href="http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&amp;kid=120709&amp;bid=263057&amp;dat=121642">
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&amp;kid=120709&amp;bid=263057&amp;dat=121642</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>Bluez-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net">
Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br><a href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users</a><br></blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_8499_15395220.1157745542633--


--===============1629989906==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
--===============1629989906==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Bluez-users mailing list
Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users

--===============1629989906==--