Return-Path: Message-ID: <57c68ddc0708200702ycd697fbx5911b08fb5956251@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:32:39 +0530 From: "siddhant tewari" To: "BlueZ users" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] Improving Transmission Speeds Reply-To: BlueZ users List-Id: BlueZ users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1122288565==" Sender: bluez-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net --===============1122288565== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_81002_1168135.1187618559961" ------=_Part_81002_1168135.1187618559961 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline hi Robert, I have had similar experience too .. I want to add one more point :- There is a difference in transfer rates while transfer a file between phone and PC between when i am simply making obex push of the file and when i am transferring files after pairing up the device. Is the above behavior expected. I feel that this should happen but a confirmation from more experienced people will give more confidence. regards siddhant On 8/20/07, Robert Rawlins wrote: > > Hello Guys, > > I'm running Bluez 3.12 and doing a little bit of file transfer over OBEX > push and seem to get considerably lower transmission speeds than when i'm > transmitting from my windows system using the windows stack. For instance, > when transmitting a 40kb file from my linux system using bluez the file will > take several seconds to transfer from acceptance of the invitation, however, > when using the same hardware on my windows box, it will transfer almost > immediately, with no noticeable delay, this speed difference becomes even > more apparent when dealing with larger files. > > I'm sure i've read in the past this is quite common when using the linux > stacks, is that right? is there any way to make a marked improvement? I'm > running bluetooth 2 with EDR capabilities, on a CSR chip. > > Thanks guys, > > Rob > > ------------------------------ > Are you the Quizmaster? Play BrainBattle with a friend now! > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Bluez-users mailing list > Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users > > ------=_Part_81002_1168135.1187618559961 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline hi Robert,
                I have had similar experience too .. I want to add one more point :-

There is a difference in transfer rates while transfer a file between phone and PC between when i am simply making obex push of the file and when i am transferring files after pairing up the device.

Is the above behavior expected. I feel that this should happen but a confirmation from more experienced people will give more confidence.

regards
siddhant

On 8/20/07, Robert Rawlins <robert_rawlins@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hello Guys,
 
I'm running Bluez 3.12 and doing a little bit of file transfer over OBEX push and seem to get considerably lower transmission speeds than when i'm transmitting from my windows system using the windows stack. For instance, when transmitting a 40kb file from my linux system using bluez the file will take several seconds to transfer from acceptance of the invitation, however, when using the same hardware on my windows box, it will transfer almost immediately, with no noticeable delay, this speed difference becomes even more apparent when dealing with larger files.
 
I'm sure i've read in the past this is quite common when using the linux stacks, is that right? is there any way to make a marked improvement? I'm running bluetooth 2 with EDR capabilities, on a CSR chip.
 
Thanks guys,
 
Rob


Are you the Quizmaster? Play BrainBattle with a friend now!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Bluez-users mailing list
Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users


------=_Part_81002_1168135.1187618559961-- --===============1122288565== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ --===============1122288565== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Bluez-users mailing list Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users --===============1122288565==--