Return-Path: Message-ID: From: Robert Rawlins To: Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 13:19:08 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Bluez-users] Improving Transmission Speeds Reply-To: BlueZ users List-Id: BlueZ users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1916265636==" Sender: bluez-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net --===============1916265636== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_a34733c1-ab8f-4a68-b92b-28f79e70ec13_" --_a34733c1-ab8f-4a68-b92b-28f79e70ec13_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Guys, =20 I'm running Bluez 3.12 and doing a little bit of file transfer over OBEX pu= sh and seem to get considerably lower transmission speeds than when i'm tra= nsmitting from my windows system using the windows stack. For instance, whe= n transmitting a 40kb file from my linux system using bluez the file will t= ake several seconds to transfer from acceptance of the invitation, however,= when using the same hardware on my windows box, it will transfer almost im= mediately, with no noticeable delay, this speed difference becomes even mor= e apparent when dealing with larger files. =20 I'm sure i've read in the past this is quite common when using the linux st= acks, is that right? is there any way to make a marked improvement? I'm run= ning bluetooth 2 with EDR capabilities, on a CSR chip. =20 Thanks guys, =20 Rob _________________________________________________________________ Try Live.com - your fast, personalised homepage with all the things you car= e about in one place. http://www.live.com/?mkt=3Den-gb = --_a34733c1-ab8f-4a68-b92b-28f79e70ec13_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Guys,
 
I'm running Bluez 3.12 and doing a little bit of file transfer over OBEX pu= sh and seem to get considerably lower transmission speeds than when i'm tra= nsmitting from my windows system using the windows stack. For instance, whe= n transmitting a 40kb file from my linux system using bluez the file will t= ake several seconds to transfer from acceptance of the invitation, however,= when using the same hardware on my windows box, it will transfer almost im= mediately, with no noticeable delay, this speed difference becomes even mor= e apparent when dealing with larger files.
 
I'm sure i've read in the past this is quite common when using the lin= ux stacks, is that right? is there any way to make a marked improvement? I'= m running bluetooth 2 with EDR capabilities, on a CSR chip.
 
Thanks guys,
 
Rob

Are you the Quizmaster? Play BrainBattle with a friend now! = --_a34733c1-ab8f-4a68-b92b-28f79e70ec13_-- --===============1916265636== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ --===============1916265636== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Bluez-users mailing list Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users --===============1916265636==--